Re: [atlarge-discuss] DNSO-GA arguments belong elsewhere!

[eric@hi-tek.com]

May we hold a few truths to be self evident?

The Internet must be not restricted yet governed.  Not by fiat or
proclamation.  But by the will of the users.

Any matter that interferes with Access, Reliability and Stability is to be
avoided.

Innovation and alternative solutions are to be supported and incorporated into
the community of the Internet.

There are problems so we must embrace solutions.

There is a community of Internet users and we are responsible to one another.

As members of the users of the Internet we must endeavour to act in the
interests of other users.

Perhaps not?

Eric

Bruce Young wrote:

> Over the last to days the conversation in this forum has been heavily
> dominiated by conversations regarding disagreements in the DNSO-GA.  I, not
> being a member of that body, have no intention of taking sides on these
> issue, except to state that this is probably not the correct form for
> carrying out these conversations.
>
> Might I suggest that, rather than using up this forum's bandwidth on what's
> wrong with the DNSO-GA , we instead turn the conversation back to building
> the At Large?
>
> Bruce Young
> Portland, Oregon
> Bruce@barelyadequate.info
> http://www.barelyadequate.info
> --------------------------------------------
> Support democratic control of the Internet!
> Go to http://www.icannatlarge.com and Join ICANN At Large!
>
>   ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
> For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de