RE: [atlarge-discuss] a legitimate election?

[Joanna Lane <jo-uk@rcn.com>]

If a person cannot find it in their heart to offer their not inconsiderable
talents to support the only membership organization that exists for
individuals in the At Large process, I question why they should be allowed
to consume that organization's limited resources. In short, I make it an
election pledge to deny posting privileges to non-members.

Regards,
Joanna

> -----Original Message-----
> From: DannyYounger@cs.com [mailto:DannyYounger@cs.com]
> Sent: Sunday, July 14, 2002 1:18 AM
> To: jo-uk@rcn.com
> Cc: atlarge-discuss@lists.fitug.de
> Subject: Re: [atlarge-discuss] a legitimate election?
>
>
> Joanna writes:  "With respect, it would be more effective if you
> would join
> first, then try
> to influence people, not the other way round."
>
> Pardon me?  This group is running an illegitimate election, and
> yet you want
> me to join up as a member?  No thanks.  I won't lend my name to a private
> club for ICANN insider cronies.
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de