Re: [atlarge-discuss] a legitimate election?

[Joop Teernstra <terastra@terabytz.co.nz>]

At 01:17 a.m. 14/07/2002 -0400, DannyYounger@cs.com wrote:
>Joanna writes:  "With respect, it would be more effective if you would join
>first, then try
>to influence people, not the other way round."
>
>Pardon me?  This group is running an illegitimate election, and yet you want
>me to join up as a member?  No thanks.  I won't lend my name to a private
>club for ICANN insider cronies.

Danny,

Joanna has a point and your blind attack against all good willing people 
who are trying to make this election legitimate makes a weak argument.
You know that I would not lend my name to a crony- club either.
icannatlarge is not (yet) such a club.
All candidates that will stand for election (even the ones that see 
tactical advantage in compromising) will be be tasked with preventing it 
from happening.

This is why I *do* respect your point that the members need adequate time 
to scrutinize their candidates and their background.

The closing of Nominations must be delayed and time for questions and 
answers must be set aside.

Vittorio, can you prepare a more generous timeline, starting with the 
announcement *to all members* that Nominations for the election are now open?


--Joop


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de