[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [atlarge-discuss] My choices for a leadership team
- To: Izumi AIZU <izumi@anr.org>
- Subject: Re: [atlarge-discuss] My choices for a leadership team
- From: James Love <james.love@cptech.org>
- Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2002 09:30:33 -0400
- CC: DannyYounger@cs.com, vb@vitaminic.net, atlarge-discuss@lists.fitug.de
- Delivered-To: mailing list atlarge-discuss@lists.fitug.de
- List-Help: <mailto:atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de>
- List-Post: <mailto:atlarge-discuss@lists.fitug.de>
- List-Subscribe: <mailto:atlarge-discuss-subscribe@lists.fitug.de>
- List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de>
- Mailing-List: contact atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de; run by ezmlm
- References: <5.0.2.5.2.20020717081512.01de4a80@anr.org>
- User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.0.0) Gecko/20020530
I agree with Izumi and others who are concerned about diverse membership on
the board. I think the next panel should address this, and make proposals
to ensure that the board is not dominated by one or a few countries, which
could happen, and which should not happen. Right now it is most important
to have good candidates from different cultures and regions.
Jamie
Izumi AIZU wrote:
> At 14:28 02/07/16 -0400, DannyYounger@cs.com wrote:
>
>> You are correct that many I selected are Americans... so what? If
>> they are
>> the best candidates to get the job done then I will support pragmatism
>> over
>> political correctness any day of the week.
>>
>> In my view, at this point in the life of the At-Large, the interests
>> of our
>> community can best be protected by those that are in a position to
>> successfully interact with the US Congress and the US Department of
>> Commerce
>> in order to ensure that the upcoming revised MoU provides for user
>> participation and representation to the greatest degree possible. The
>> Americans that I have cited are capable of exerting such influence.
>
>
>
> I don't mind if someone nominates all Americans or All Japanese or Chinese,
> whatever, that is up to him/her, but I do mind if the end-result of the
> panel
> composition is very much dominated by a single country/ethnic groups for
> the new at-large structure. We should try it to get wider representation
> and participation. Dealing with USG is not the direct mission, and dealing
> with US Congress is not the business of the new organization, at least
> directly, in my opinion.
>
> izumi
>
>
>
>
>> Who can you propose that equally might have such leverage with these
>> decision-makers? I am open to suggestions...
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
>> For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
> For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de
>
>
>
--
------
James Love, Consumer Project on Technology
http://www.cptech.org, mailto:love@cptech.org
voice: 1.202.387.8030; mobile 1.202.361.3040
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de