[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [atlarge-discuss] My choices for a leadership team
- To: James Love <james.love@cptech.org>, Izumi AIZU <izumi@anr.org>
- Subject: Re: [atlarge-discuss] My choices for a leadership team
- From: Erick Iriarte Ahon <faia@amauta.rcp.net.pe>
- Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2002 10:31:47 -0500
- Cc: DannyYounger@cs.com, vb@vitaminic.net, atlarge-discuss@lists.fitug.de
- Delivered-To: mailing list atlarge-discuss@lists.fitug.de
- In-Reply-To: <3D357179.7090500@cptech.org>
- List-Help: <mailto:atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de>
- List-Post: <mailto:atlarge-discuss@lists.fitug.de>
- List-Subscribe: <mailto:atlarge-discuss-subscribe@lists.fitug.de>
- List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de>
- Mailing-List: contact atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de; run by ezmlm
- References: <5.0.2.5.2.20020717081512.01de4a80@anr.org>
I'm agree with both of you.
Is important the can understand that Internet is a global process, and
necessary for all.
Perharps is necessary almost one by each region,
Erick Iriarte
At 09:30 a.m. 17/07/2002 -0400, James Love wrote:
>I agree with Izumi and others who are concerned about diverse membership
>on the board. I think the next panel should address this, and make
>proposals to ensure that the board is not dominated by one or a few
>countries, which could happen, and which should not happen. Right now it
>is most important to have good candidates from different cultures and regions.
>
>Jamie
>
>
>Izumi AIZU wrote:
>>At 14:28 02/07/16 -0400, DannyYounger@cs.com wrote:
>>
>>>You are correct that many I selected are Americans... so what? If they are
>>>the best candidates to get the job done then I will support pragmatism over
>>>political correctness any day of the week.
>>>
>>>In my view, at this point in the life of the At-Large, the interests of our
>>>community can best be protected by those that are in a position to
>>>successfully interact with the US Congress and the US Department of Commerce
>>>in order to ensure that the upcoming revised MoU provides for user
>>>participation and representation to the greatest degree possible. The
>>>Americans that I have cited are capable of exerting such influence.
>>
>>I don't mind if someone nominates all Americans or All Japanese or Chinese,
>>whatever, that is up to him/her, but I do mind if the end-result of the panel
>>composition is very much dominated by a single country/ethnic groups for
>>the new at-large structure. We should try it to get wider representation
>>and participation. Dealing with USG is not the direct mission, and dealing
>>with US Congress is not the business of the new organization, at least
>>directly, in my opinion.
>>izumi
>>
>>
>>>Who can you propose that equally might have such leverage with these
>>>decision-makers? I am open to suggestions...
>>>
>>>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
>>>For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de
>>
>>
>>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
>>For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de
>>
>
>
>
>--
>------
>James Love, Consumer Project on Technology
>http://www.cptech.org, mailto:love@cptech.org
>voice: 1.202.387.8030; mobile 1.202.361.3040
>
>
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
>For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de