Re: [atlarge-discuss] Re: ALAC

[Izumi AIZU <izumi@anr.org>]

I would like to argue for the importance of regional diversity as one of
the fundamental issues and reasons of AtLarge participation if ICANN is
to become a true global body.

I also like to let ALAC work on the issue of election. I made the following
comments in the ALOC list:

---------
Perhaps one of the important tasks for ALAC is to visit this issue
of election and make recommendations for workable and pragmatic
solution in not hasty way. I believe that some members of the board at least
did agree with the value and need for election in general, but they did not
accept the specific proposal made by the ALSC and the AtLarge advocates
in Accra that were not sufficient against capture and cost issues for them.

Revising this immediately at ALAC may cause some concern for those
who do not like the idea of election anyway, but it is still worth
to consider it as one of the (better) way of public participation.

ALAC's task should not be only election issues, and we need to
state that clearly, but election should be one of the main areas,
I would suggest.

---------

best,

izumi

At 21:38 02/07/24 -0400, DannyYounger@cs.com wrote:
>Dear Gabriel, Vittorio, Edmundo and Izumi:
>
>You have been selected by Denise Michel and Esther Dyson to fill out the
>details of an "At-Large Advisory Committee" and to present recommendations to
>the Evolution and Reform Committee by 16 August.
>
>What do each of you plan to recommend?  Your initial thoughts?
>
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
>For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de