[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[atlarge-discuss] Issues
- To: alexander@svensson.de, atlarge-discuss@lists.fitug.de
- Subject: [atlarge-discuss] Issues
- From: DannyYounger@cs.com
- Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2002 17:13:25 EDT
- Delivered-To: mailing list atlarge-discuss@lists.fitug.de
- List-Help: <mailto:atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de>
- List-Post: <mailto:atlarge-discuss@lists.fitug.de>
- List-Subscribe: <mailto:atlarge-discuss-subscribe@lists.fitug.de>
- List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de>
- Mailing-List: contact atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de; run by ezmlm
Alex writes:
<< Unfortunately, in my view there are many people discussing At Large
issues who have never once said anything about substantive domain
name issues... frankly, it makes you wonder when people /only/ participate
in
meta-discussions and are not interested in the issues themselves. >>
I agree with Alex.
As you consider the candidates, first ask yourself how many even bothered to
respond to questions posted on this list, and second, what user issues have
they identified as important. In my view, this election is shaping up as a
farce of major proportions, and that does not reflect well upon this
organization.
The ballots are already being sent out tomorrow, and what do we really know
about most of these candidates with respect to "issues"? Almost nothing.
How many have even taken the time to submit candidate statements?
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de