[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [atlarge-discuss] Straw Poll: ALOC Draft 3.0
- To: Hans Klein <hans.klein@pubpolicy.gatech.edu>, Izumi AIZU <izumi@anr.org>, atlarge-discuss@lists.fitug.de
- Subject: RE: [atlarge-discuss] Straw Poll: ALOC Draft 3.0
- From: Joanna Lane <jo-uk@rcn.com>
- Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2002 23:12:49 -0400
- Delivered-To: mailing list atlarge-discuss@lists.fitug.de
- Importance: Normal
- In-reply-to: <5.1.0.14.2.20020726192756.061856c8@mail.atl.bellsouth.net>
- List-Help: <mailto:atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de>
- List-Post: <mailto:atlarge-discuss@lists.fitug.de>
- List-Subscribe: <mailto:atlarge-discuss-subscribe@lists.fitug.de>
- List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de>
- Mailing-List: contact atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de; run by ezmlm
> From: Hans Klein [mailto:hans.klein@pubpolicy.gatech.edu]
> To: Izumi AIZU; atlarge-discuss@lists.fitug.de
> In the ALOC, support for including a statement in favor of direct
> elections
> came from:
> Peter Shane
> Izumi Aizu
> Hans Klein
> Sotiris Sotiropoulos
> Vittorio Bertola
>
> On the other hand, in the face of Esther and Denise's comments,
> discussion
> has ceased. Or maybe it just moved to a more inner circle! ;-)
>
> Hans
Correct me if I'm wrong, but that's a majority of the ALOC, so what is
Denise's problem? Do you think she wants corroborative evidence that the At
large community favors direct elections over the Blueprint? I know - let's
have a clean sheet study and consult the community about it - shouldn't cost
more than $450,000. Oh, I forgot - Denise already did that and recommended
direct elections!
Regards,
Joanna
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de