[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [atlarge-discuss] Straw Poll: ALOC Draft 3.0
- To: Izumi AIZU <izumi@anr.org>, atlarge-discuss@lists.fitug.de
- Subject: Re: [atlarge-discuss] Straw Poll: ALOC Draft 3.0
- From: "Hans Klein" <hans.klein@pubpolicy.gatech.edu>
- Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2002 19:30:53 -0400
- Cc: Joanna Lane <jo-uk@rcn.com>
- Delivered-To: mailing list atlarge-discuss@lists.fitug.de
- In-Reply-To: <5.0.2.5.2.20020726151509.056d4e40@anr.org>
- List-Help: <mailto:atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de>
- List-Post: <mailto:atlarge-discuss@lists.fitug.de>
- List-Subscribe: <mailto:atlarge-discuss-subscribe@lists.fitug.de>
- List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de>
- Mailing-List: contact atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de; run by ezmlm
- References: <DPEOJECBMOLLLJOFDNDPGEOLCLAA.jo-uk@rcn.com><5.1.0.14.2.20020725133933.07c2f910@mail.atl.bellsouth.net>
In the ALOC, support for including a statement in favor of direct elections
came from:
Peter Shane
Izumi Aizu
Hans Klein
Sotiris Sotiropoulos
Vittorio Bertola
On the other hand, in the face of Esther and Denise's comments, discussion
has ceased. Or maybe it just moved to a more inner circle! ;-)
Hans
At 03:26 PM 7/26/2002 +0900, Izumi AIZU wrote:
>This is slightly different interpretation from what I had in mind about
>ALOC proposal.
>Correct me if I am wrong, please.
>
>The so-called "ALOC Draft 3.0" was personally proposed by Hans Klein who
>is also the ALOC member, but I don't think most members of ALOC has
>indicated any opinion about this.
>
>AND the ALOC coordinator Denise Michel said it was NOT the "final version"
>formally proposed.
>
>So, as a member of ALOC, I was confused, and still I am not too clear as to
>the status of Hans's proposal, but I don't think it has reached to be an ALOC
>proposal.
>
>So, in spite of Joanna's good intention, I think the way this simple straw
>poll is
>presented is quite mis-leading and adds more confusion than clarification
>to the
>members of this icannatlarge.com list.
>
>I think I understand what Hans is trying to suggest and Joanna's thinking,
>and I have similar thinking, but I hope we should respect some difference
>of opinions
>or positions and allow them together without twisting the facts or intentions
>so that we can broadly share the common goal without blaming each other
>too much.
>
>If Joanna asks simply how much Hans's amendments gets support, then
>that will be much better, I think.
>
>best,
>
>izumi
>
>At 00:02 02/07/26 -0400, Joanna Lane wrote:
>>In order to assist the ALOC with its task of determining support amongst
>>affected stakeholders for an appropriate structure to represent At Large
>>interests in the ICANN process, would Members of ICANNAtLarge.com please
>>indicate their preference below in relation to the Proposed Draft 3.0
>>reprinted below.
>>_________________________________________________________________________
>>
>>POLL Question:
>>
>>Should the At-Large Organizing Committee (ALOC) submit VERSION 3.0 (Proposed
>>Final Draft) to the ICANN Evolution & Reform Committee On the Design of An
>>At Large Advisory Committee (ALAC)?
>>
>>YES [ ]
>>NO [ ]
>>
>>COMMENTS:
>>
>>_________________________________________________________________
>
> >> Izumi Aizu <<
> Asia Network Research
> www.anr.org
> &
> GLOCOM /Institute for HyperNetwork Society
>
> << Writing the Future of the History >>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de