Re: [atlarge-discuss] Straw Poll: ALOC Draft 3.0

[Sotiris Sotiropoulos <sotiris@hermesnetwork.com>]

Izumi,

Stop it.  Joanna is asking our membership if they support Han's draft document,
that's the whole point.  It's irrelevant what you claim is the "official" version.
Of course, you are a longtime ICANN patsy so I'm not surprised by your shrewd little
attempt to stall such an opinion poll on our list.

Sotiris Sotiropoulos

Izumi AIZU wrote:

> This is slightly different interpretation from what I had in mind about
> ALOC proposal.
> Correct me if I am wrong, please.
>
> The so-called "ALOC Draft 3.0" was personally proposed by Hans Klein who
> is also the ALOC member, but I don't think most members of ALOC has
> indicated any opinion about this.
>
> AND the ALOC coordinator Denise Michel  said it was NOT the "final version"
> formally proposed.
>
> So, as a member of ALOC, I was confused, and still I am not too clear as to
> the status of Hans's proposal, but I don't think it has reached to be an ALOC
> proposal.
>
> So, in spite of Joanna's good intention, I think the way this simple straw
> poll is
> presented is quite mis-leading and adds more confusion than clarification to the
> members of this icannatlarge.com list.
>
> I think I understand what Hans is trying to suggest and Joanna's thinking,
> and I have similar thinking, but I hope we should respect some difference
> of opinions
> or positions and allow them together without twisting the facts or intentions
> so that we can broadly share the common goal without blaming each other
> too much.
>
> If Joanna asks simply how much Hans's amendments gets support, then
> that will be much better, I think.
>
> best,
>
> izumi
>
> At 00:02 02/07/26 -0400, Joanna Lane wrote:
> >In order to assist the ALOC with its task of determining support amongst
> >affected stakeholders for an appropriate structure to represent At Large
> >interests in the ICANN process, would Members of ICANNAtLarge.com please
> >indicate their preference below in relation to the Proposed Draft 3.0
> >reprinted below.
> >_________________________________________________________________________
> >
> >POLL Question:
> >
> >Should the At-Large Organizing Committee (ALOC) submit VERSION 3.0 (Proposed
> >Final Draft) to the ICANN Evolution & Reform Committee On the Design of An
> >At Large Advisory Committee (ALAC)?
> >
> >YES  [   ]
> >NO   [   ]
> >
> >COMMENTS:
> >
> >_________________________________________________________________
>
>                       >> Izumi Aizu <<
>                   Asia Network Research
>                          www.anr.org
>                               &
>   GLOCOM /Institute for HyperNetwork Society
>
>          << Writing the Future of the History >>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
> For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de