Re: [atlarge-discuss] Straw Poll: ALOC Draft 3.0

[Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com>]

Izumi and all stakeholders or other interested parties,

  Than you can present your own poll if you wish here.  So
please do so.  Regardless, Joanna's poll is at least an honest
attempt to garner the members opinion on a very questionable
ALOC Draft (3.0) or Han's version, or even Denise's yet to
be seen version...

  Erco Izumi, I believe that  your complaint, although nicely
stated and explained, is respectfully unfounded...

Izumi AIZU wrote:

> This is slightly different interpretation from what I had in mind about
> ALOC proposal.
> Correct me if I am wrong, please.
>
> The so-called "ALOC Draft 3.0" was personally proposed by Hans Klein who
> is also the ALOC member, but I don't think most members of ALOC has
> indicated any opinion about this.
>
> AND the ALOC coordinator Denise Michel  said it was NOT the "final version"
> formally proposed.
>
> So, as a member of ALOC, I was confused, and still I am not too clear as to
> the status of Hans's proposal, but I don't think it has reached to be an ALOC
> proposal.
>
> So, in spite of Joanna's good intention, I think the way this simple straw
> poll is
> presented is quite mis-leading and adds more confusion than clarification to the
> members of this icannatlarge.com list.
>
> I think I understand what Hans is trying to suggest and Joanna's thinking,
> and I have similar thinking, but I hope we should respect some difference
> of opinions
> or positions and allow them together without twisting the facts or intentions
> so that we can broadly share the common goal without blaming each other
> too much.
>
> If Joanna asks simply how much Hans's amendments gets support, then
> that will be much better, I think.
>
> best,
>
> izumi
>
> At 00:02 02/07/26 -0400, Joanna Lane wrote:
> >In order to assist the ALOC with its task of determining support amongst
> >affected stakeholders for an appropriate structure to represent At Large
> >interests in the ICANN process, would Members of ICANNAtLarge.com please
> >indicate their preference below in relation to the Proposed Draft 3.0
> >reprinted below.
> >_________________________________________________________________________
> >
> >POLL Question:
> >
> >Should the At-Large Organizing Committee (ALOC) submit VERSION 3.0 (Proposed
> >Final Draft) to the ICANN Evolution & Reform Committee On the Design of An
> >At Large Advisory Committee (ALAC)?
> >
> >YES  [   ]
> >NO   [   ]
> >
> >COMMENTS:
> >
> >_________________________________________________________________
>
>                       >> Izumi Aizu <<
>                   Asia Network Research
>                          www.anr.org
>                               &
>   GLOCOM /Institute for HyperNetwork Society
>
>          << Writing the Future of the History >>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
> For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de

Regards,
--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup - (Over 124k members/stakeholders strong!)
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com
Contact Number:  972-244-3801 or 214-244-4827
Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de