Re: [atlarge-discuss] Question 2 for Jamie

[James Love <james.love@cptech.org>]

Joop, rather than have members struggle to find the links to the archives, 
buried between Ira Magiziners comments and other random links, and then try 
to figure out what happened, it might be useful to report decisions the 
panel does make, when it actually makes decisions.   For example, as an 
illustration, votes 7 and 8 deal with the web page management...  I can 
imagine a list of these official panel votes, with the proposal and the 
actual votes.   What I have below seems to be 4 yes and 1 no on vote 7, and 
5 yes on vote 8.     If these were reported in some logical way it could 
also help the panel members by knowing if there vote had been recorded or 
not, something that people sometimes don't appreciate during the back and 
forth on an issue.  For example, here, Izumi participated in the debate, but 
I'm not sure if he ever formally voted.

I would also call your attention to the thread beginning here on the control 
over the passwords.
http://www.fitug.de/atlarge-panel/0205/msg00070.html

For the web page, here are the people who expressed support for having the 
panel decide who has access to the web page passwords, including the several 
alternatives (the whole panel, a few members of the panel, people designated 
by the panel).
      VB, Izumi, RH, JL, sg.

VB made a specific proposal to give the following persons passwords to the 
site,

Izumi Aizu
Vittorio Bertola
Sotiris Sotiropoulos

And there was discussion also of having Sotiris making some changes on the 
web site.  In my opinion, this is what the panel wanted to do.

Even though I did not see VB bring these points to another formal vote, 
beyond the discussions mentioned above, the was ZERO support for having you 
make all the decisions on who gets access to the web site.  This is why I 
told you that VB has the full support of the panel on this issue.   At this 
point, it will be an issue for the new panel, and I do hope one of the first 
orders of business is to address the web page management issue.

I will further note that the issue of control over the web site was given a 
higher priority when we discovered we were being billed for your work on the 
web site, something I had not been aware of before, and to which we had 
never agreed.

    Jamie

----------------

http://www.fitug.de/atlarge-panel/0205/msg00049.html

# [atlarge-panel] call for a webmaster, Vittorio Bertola <vb@vitaminic.net> 
   (May 06, 2002)

     * Re: [atlarge-panel] call for a webmaster, "James Love" 
<james.love@cptech.org>   (May 06, 2002)
     * Re: [atlarge-panel] call for a webmaster, Izumi AIZU <izumi@anr.org> 
   (May 07, 2002)
           o Re: [atlarge-panel] call for a webmaster, Vittorio Bertola 
<vb@vitaminic.net>   (May 07, 2002)


http://www.fitug.de/atlarge-panel/0205/msg00069.html
Votes 7 and 8....
Vote 7    yes vb, wk, jl, ss
           no  sg
Vote 8    yes  vb, wk, sg, jl, ss

------
James Love, Consumer Project on Technology
http://www.cptech.org, mailto:love@cptech.org
voice: 1.202.387.8030; mobile 1.202.361.3040


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de