Re: [atlarge-discuss] correction

[Gary Osbourne <gro@direct.ca>]

At 03:42 PM 29/07/02 +1200, Joop Teernstra wrote:

>At 11:51 a.m. 28/07/2002 -0400, James Love wrote:
>
>>Even though I did not see VB bring these points to another formal vote, 
>>beyond the discussions mentioned above, the was ZERO support for having 
>>you make all the decisions on who gets access to the web site.
>
>"That specific policy position was never brought up, let alone brought to 
>a vote."
>
>Correction:
>Now I managed to check the Archive , I saw that it *was* brought up as a 
>policy position. It did not find support and was not brought to a full vote.

It did receive considerable support. Going by the archive
it was not brought to a vote. Can anyone explain why?
Regardless, that position would pass my consensus test.

>Hmm, I see how easy it is to make unsupported statements

Can you point to one single credible individual who
supports your statements Joop? If not, that fails my
consensus test quite spectacularily. -g
  


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de