Re: [atlarge-discuss] correction

[Joop Teernstra <terastra@terabytz.co.nz>]

At 06:23 p.m. 29/07/2002 -0700, Gary Osbourne wrote:

>You're right, I missed that. I must have also
>missed the majority vote to keep you on as
>webmaster of icannatlarge.com. Could you
>provide a pointer to it?

That vote was actually taken, but I'm not going to search the archives for it.
Maybe when you become a member. :-)

>>Quorum and majority are there for a reason:
>>to protect the democracy of the membership.
>
>And to protect the self-appointed and
>unelected if twisted sufficiently.

It would need a lot of twisting. And if you care to become a member you can 
help guarding against such twisting.

>  I find
>this very ironic, it looks no different than
>Hans alleging problems with ALOC staff, or
>the Judge in the Auerbach case today pointing
>out the BoD members, rather than just staff,
>have control over resources. Not only does
>your control make this look like IDNO, it
>makes it look like ALOC and ICANN. -g

I agree with what concerns you. That 's why I step back now.
You are correct in scrutinizing where the money came from and to whom it goes.
It is all public and open at www.icannatlarge.com/funding.htm

That is the difference with ALOC,  ICANN and the ALSC.

Focus on the bigger picture.
You can help icannatlarge by becoming a member and claim your rights as a 
member.
Then you can help insure that icannatlarge does not get captured by its 
webmaster, webhost or listowner.



--Joop


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de