The name of the organisation itself has to be a fairly urgent "task" to be
accomplished and determined by our members. It's linked, perhaps, to Mission
Statement - as some people may want the name of the organisation to reflect
a fairly broad mission (I favour this, to broaden membership and make us
more truly representative) - while others want a narrower technical
relationship to ICANN (in which case ICANN-style terms like @large may
figure... personally I'd prefer we steer clear of this, but I may get
outvoted)
There is no reason why the word "@large" would be associated with ICANN. It
has aquired its repuation. If we drop it we lose part of our legitimacy
(ICANN is known and interests, we do not ... yet) Also ... someone else
will take it as the ALOC did. ccTLDs know what @large is and its
legitimacy: actually the @large are the ccTLD legitimacy. If we drop that
flag we lose part of our soul and part of our outreach capacity.