[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[atlarge-discuss] Re: DNSO Election




Thomas,

Thanks for the information.

What we can realistically attempt is to manifest our desire for an alternative to ICANN insiders. Just as GA participation offers little chance of directly influencing ICANN but is still important, so is running a "users candidate" for the board.

I believe we should support a candidate. That candidate could speak out on behalf of users.

Nominations are due by August 30, so we have some time.

Hans







At 11:15 PM 8/14/2002 +0200, Thomas Roessler wrote:
The detailed procedures are available at
<http://www.dnso.org/elections/2002.DNSO-ICANN-nomination-proc.html>.

If you go to that URL, and subsequently to the icann-nominations
archive, you'll notice that Alejandro Pisanty himself is the most likely candidate to emerge from that election (unless I'm missing some bylaw reason why he can't remain on the board).
--
Thomas Roessler http://log.does-not-exist.org/




On 2002-08-14 17:11:23 -0400, Hans Klein wrote:
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 17:11:23 -0400
To: Alexander Svensson <alexander@svensson.de>,
Thomas Roessler <roessler@does-not-exist.org>
From: "Hans Klein" <hans.klein@pubpolicy.gatech.edu>
Subject: DNSO Election
Cc: atlarge-discuss@lists.fitug.de
X-No-Spam: whitelist


Dear Thomas, Dear Alexander,

ICANNatlarge.com and the GA should be active in the nomination process for the DNSO director.

Would you guide this process? What are the procedures, and what are the deadlines?

Maybe WG-ICANN can be involved, too.

Hans

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de