Re: [atlarge-discuss] Revised ALAC report submission schedule

[eric@hi-tek.com]

I think you may have a point Danny,
But Judith is correct to put it to the test.

So now we have one example, that is piss poor performance for two years.

e

DannyYounger@cs.com wrote:

> In a message dated 8/15/02 2:10:24 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
> joppenheimer@icbtollfree.com writes:
>
> << What evidence have you of
>  ICANN policies *ever* benefiting at large interests? >>
>
> Judith,
>
> Just one example, ICANN Resolution 02.83 on the Redemption Grace Period
> benefits At-Large interests.  Don't let your cynicism completely blind you to
> some of the positive work that is being done.  It's easy to demonize your
> adversaries, to paint them as evil incarnate -- it's a technique long used in
> political circles, but it is also a distortion.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
> For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de