Re: [atlarge-discuss] Revised ALAC report submission schedule

[eric@hi-tek.com]

Danny you seem to be misplacing lip service with allowing input.
Our great persuasiveness has never had an impact.
If it is community input that works here, why is there no rebid or at-large
elected board members?

Certainly you jest?
eric

DannyYounger@cs.com wrote:

> Judith, you ask:
>
> << Where else... has At Large attained any tangible degree of voice in ICANN,
> with a platform to impact its direction and policies?  >>
>
> The General Assembly of the DNSO has been used as a platform to express user
> concerns.  I regularly correspond with members on the Board through the GA,
> and yes... they do answer.  The "impact" is a function of the persuasiveness
> of the arguments and the degree to which such arguments enjoy community
> support.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
> For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de