Re: [atlarge-discuss] Our New Name Isn't...

["NameCritic" <chris1@telnor.net>]

I second that motion as well.

Chris McElroy aka NameCritic
----- Original Message -----
From: "Richard Henderson" <richardhenderson@ntlworld.com>
To: "DPF" <david@farrar.com>
Cc: <harivijapur@rediffmail.com>; <atlarge-discuss@lists.fitug.de>;
<atlarge-panel@lists.fitug.de>
Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 8:02 AM
Subject: Re: [atlarge-discuss] Our New Name Isn't...


> The present owner of icannatlarge.org is unable to transfer the name to
the
> panel.
>
> www.icannatlarge.org is presently "On Hold"
>
> This can be seen if you go to a Deleted Domains site like:
>
> http://www.deleteddomains.com/cgi-bin/browse.pl
>
> Show: .org
> Domains that were: "deleted or placed on hold"
> Enter: "in the last 60 days"
> that "contain"
> the letters "icann"
>
> CLICK "Show Domains"
>
> ...and you'll see that www.icannatlarge.org has been "On Hold" since
> 09-29-02
>
> Therefore yes, David, I would prefer that we move for the second choice
> (www.atlarge.org)
>
> Richard
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: DPF <david@farrar.com>
> To: Richard Henderson <richardhenderson@ntlworld.com>
> Cc: <harivijapur@rediffmail.com>; <atlarge-discuss@lists.fitug.de>;
> <atlarge-panel@lists.fitug.de>
> Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 8:39 PM
> Subject: Re: [atlarge-discuss] Our New Name Isn't...
>
>
> On Thu, 3 Oct 2002 15:17:13 +0100, "Richard Henderson"
> <richardhenderson@ntlworld.com> wrote:
>
> >Look, could someone PLEASE clarify this situation?
> >
> >I'm wholly unhappy to proceed with this name, especially when it doesn't
> >resolve and there is continuing ambiguity. I also feel there is ambiguity
> as
> >to whether most people actually wanted ICANN in the organisation's name.
It
> >may be true that more people wanted icannatlarge.org than any ONE of the
> >other names, but that's because the "Icann" name was ONE name, whereas
the
> >"non-Icann" votes were split between three names.
>
> A preferential ballot overcomes this by rankings being re-distributed
> as the least popular drops off.  There is IMO no question about the
> result.
>
> All we nee the panel to do is ask the current holder of
> icannatlarge.org to immediately transfer it to the name of this
> organisation and make it resolve.  If they are unwilling to do this
> then implement the second choice.
>
> DPF
>
>
> --
> david@farrar.com
> ICQ 29964527
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
> For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de