[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [atlarge-discuss] web site
Let me be perfectly clear:
1) The job of webmaster does not IMO require a team as Jefsey proposes.
2) Should the position of webmaster be allocated to a committee, that is the one
committee I will have no part in, though I will wish them the best of luck (as
they will need it). Webmaster-by-committee is by definition an impossibility,
one I do not care to verify.
3) I reiterate my offer of hosting the site if chosen to implement and manage
it. I consider the position to be a technical one and will execute my duties
accordingly, unlike my (possibly) predecessor. Furthermore, I will abide by
whatever rules the Panel decides to approve with respect to the post. Aside
from that, it's a take it or leave it situation where my offer to be webmaster
and host is concerned. I don't have time to play any more games.
Thanks,
Sotiris Sotiropoulos
NameCritic wrote:
> I notice mine and Sotiris name listed as possible webmasters. My
> participation with the website would be to provide assistance to whoever is
> in charge of the project. I am not a contender for the job of webmaster. I'm
> ok with being an indian instead of a chief. Seems we have enough chiefs
> already..
>
> So Sotiris, you want to field those questions? I haven't even been invited
> to join the wg-web at this point if it already is active. If they need help
> they are welcome to call on me. If not, I'm happy to provide help in other
> areas.
>
> Just want some direction. Something that so far seems to be lacking.
>
> Chris McElroy aka NameCritic
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Bruce Young" <bruce@barelyadequate.info>
> To: <atlarge-discuss@lists.fitug.de>
> Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 5:13 PM
> Subject: RE: [atlarge-discuss] web site
>
> > I concur with what Jefsey is saying here. Canditate for the job should
> note
> > their plans in detail.
> >
> > Bruce Young
> > Portland, Oregon USA
> > bruce@barelyadequate.info
> > http://www.barelyadequate.info
> > --------------------------------------------
> > Support democratic control of the Internet!
> > Go to http://www.icannatlarge.com and Join ICANN At Large!
> >
> >
> > | -----Original Message-----
> > | From: J-F C. (Jefsey) Morfin [mailto:jefsey@club-internet.fr]
> > | Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 3:47 PM
> > | To: atlarge-discuss@lists.fitug.de
> > | Subject: [atlarge-discuss] web site
> > |
> > |
> > | As member of the WG-WEB I strongly suggest that possible webmasters or
> > | co-webmaster (like Sotiris and NameCritics) tell us about:
> > |
> > | - the machine, platform and accesses they plan.
> > | - the machine IP address and backup-schedule.
> > | - the kind of site they plan
> > | - who will participate/should participate to the site management
> > | - how documents will be produced, accepted
> > | - how will the site relate with the sub-sites.
> > |
> > | before we strike any decision.
> > |
> > | The reason why is that we have experienced the control of Joop.
> > | I am sure
> > | all of us want it to change, but for the better, building on
> experience,
> > | with Joop continuous cooperation (nothing prevent some part of
> > | the site to
> > | remain on the existing system: for example the forum).. None of
> > | us wants to
> > | spend time disputing over site details or webmaster's attitude.
> > | The first
> > | one wanting things to be cool being the new Webmaster and his
> > | team. This
> > | means that we also want to have a true agreement on the way we can
> > | terminate the mission; protecting both us and the webmaster (he will be
> > | controverted by nature, and he must feel stable and supported).
> > |
> > | This means that all the Panel Members and all the WG-WEB are
> > | members of the
> > | editorial committee. We want to work out a solution permitting
> > | them to work
> > | together?
> > |
> > | We want good out-reach support. So we want to go the way Richard
> defined
> > | it: 190 local sites with possible hundreds of participants. This
> > | should be
> > | well organized through the WG-DNS resource allocation, but the
> > | links from
> > | the main site will have to be maintained and documented. This
> > | calls for a
> > | lot of cooperation, as the site develops.
> > |
> > | jfc
> > |
> > |
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
> > For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
> For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de