[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [atlarge-discuss] web site



I concur with what Jefsey is saying here.  Canditate for the job should note
their plans in detail.

Bruce Young
Portland, Oregon USA
bruce@barelyadequate.info
http://www.barelyadequate.info
--------------------------------------------
Support democratic control of the Internet!
Go to http://www.icannatlarge.com and Join ICANN At Large!


|  -----Original Message-----
|  From: J-F C. (Jefsey) Morfin [mailto:jefsey@club-internet.fr]
|  Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 3:47 PM
|  To: atlarge-discuss@lists.fitug.de
|  Subject: [atlarge-discuss] web site
|
|
|  As member of the WG-WEB I strongly suggest that possible webmasters or
|  co-webmaster (like Sotiris and NameCritics) tell us about:
|
|  - the machine, platform and accesses they plan.
|  - the machine IP address and backup-schedule.
|  - the kind of site they plan
|  - who will participate/should participate to the site management
|  - how documents will be produced, accepted
|  - how will the site relate with the sub-sites.
|
|  before we strike any decision.
|
|  The reason why is that we have experienced the control of Joop.
|  I am sure
|  all of us want it to change, but for the better, building on experience,
|  with Joop continuous cooperation (nothing prevent some part of
|  the site to
|  remain on the existing system: for example the forum).. None of
|  us wants to
|  spend time disputing over site details or webmaster's attitude.
|  The first
|  one wanting things to be cool being the new Webmaster and his
|  team.  This
|  means that we also want to have a true agreement on the way we can
|  terminate the mission; protecting both us and the webmaster (he will be
|  controverted by nature, and he must feel stable and supported).
|
|  This means that all the Panel Members and all the WG-WEB are
|  members of the
|  editorial committee. We want to work out a solution permitting
|  them to work
|  together?
|
|  We want good out-reach support. So we want to go the way Richard defined
|  it: 190 local sites with possible hundreds of participants. This
|  should be
|  well organized through the WG-DNS resource allocation, but the
|  links from
|  the main site will have to be maintained and documented. This
|  calls for a
|  lot of cooperation, as the site develops.
|
|  jfc
|
|


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de