[atlarge-discuss] web site

["J-F C. (Jefsey) Morfin" <jefsey@club-internet.fr>]

As member of the WG-WEB I strongly suggest that possible webmasters or 
co-webmaster (like Sotiris and NameCritics) tell us about:

- the machine, platform and accesses they plan.
- the machine IP address and backup-schedule.
- the kind of site they plan
- who will participate/should participate to the site management
- how documents will be produced, accepted
- how will the site relate with the sub-sites.

before we strike any decision.

The reason why is that we have experienced the control of Joop. I am sure 
all of us want it to change, but for the better, building on experience, 
with Joop continuous cooperation (nothing prevent some part of the site to 
remain on the existing system: for example the forum).. None of us wants to 
spend time disputing over site details or webmaster's attitude. The first 
one wanting things to be cool being the new Webmaster and his team.  This 
means that we also want to have a true agreement on the way we can 
terminate the mission; protecting both us and the webmaster (he will be 
controverted by nature, and he must feel stable and supported).

This means that all the Panel Members and all the WG-WEB are members of the 
editorial committee. We want to work out a solution permitting them to work 
together?

We want good out-reach support. So we want to go the way Richard defined 
it: 190 local sites with possible hundreds of participants. This should be 
well organized through the WG-DNS resource allocation, but the links from 
the main site will have to be maintained and documented. This calls for a 
lot of cooperation, as the site develops.

jfc

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de