Re: [atlarge-discuss] Panel / Panel Chair mandate and responsibilities

[Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com>]

Hugh and all stakeholders or other interested parties and members,

Hugh Blair wrote:

> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Jeff Williams
>
> > The Panel and this membership voted on the limited mandate
> > for those panel members.  Yet the new Chair, much like the
> > previous chair, has decided to negate their primary
> > responsibilities of the Mandated tasks that they are
> > supposed to be concentrating on in favor of other non-panel
> > tasks that the members can and should do for themselves
> > in self organization such a Working groups, committees, and
> > perhaps Task forces.
> >
> >   The primary tasks of which the Panel was elected to do,
> > would go a very long way in getting the primary formation
> > of this organization off and running.  So far though, they
> > have chosen to deliberately venture into areas of other
> > debates and discussion that are outside getting those
> > tasks completed or even worked upon.
>
> Jeff,
>
> Maybe it would benefit all members if you would write a
> simple description detailing your impression of the
> "limited mandate" that the Panel members are under, with
> links to the archives to substantiate your writings.

  I have done this three times Hugh.  Hence, I would think that
doing it again would not adequately address the situation
any more than it did when over the past three weeks, I had
done as you suggest three previous times.

  Everyone here as far as I still know, still has access to the
archives for themselves.  They/you can do a look up or Vittorio's
original post on what the language of the Mandate is that we voted
the current panel members to accomplish.

>
>
> And a concise list of the Panel Chair's responsibilities
> and tasks would also be helpful.

  This also is in the archives as well.  It should be on the
Web page as well.

> Since so much time has
> gone by and so many topics have passed through this list,
> I think we could all use a fresh recap.

  I agree.  Every member should do recaps as they feel they
need to themselves.  I strongly recommend that each and every
member do so on an as needed basis.  However as I am not
the secretary for this organization, I don't think it would
be beneficial for me to do such a recap for the members.

> Several members
> have expressed confusion about these two topics.

  Yes I know that 4 or 5 members have expressed such
confusion.  Hence again it would benefit them to do an
in depth review of the archives of this forum for themselves.

>
>
> In all seriousness,
>
> Hugh
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
> For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de

Regards,
--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup - (Over 127k members/stakeholders strong!)
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com
Contact Number: 214-244-4827 or 972-244-3801
Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de