Re: [atlarge-discuss] Re: WG-DNS name protection

[Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com>]

Danny and all stakeholders or other interested parties and members,

  This is all well and fine Danny.  But remember ICANN has singed a new
MoU.  That MoU requires stakeholder participation and approval.
It is clear that from '99 forwards that the ICANN BOD and staff
have not been inclusive of andy and all stakeholders that wish to
participate via the White paper requirements as well.  Hence
ICANN "Rules" as to "Accreditation" are and cannot be considered
legitimate for stakeholders that cannot or are not allowed to
participate due to blocking them in various ways.  Hence Danny,
although to a large degree your comments/observations regarding
ICANNATLARGE.ORG are accurate, they in now way, dis-include
the members of ICANNATLARGE.ORG either...


DannyYounger@cs.com wrote:

> Jamie,
>
> Before you begin questioning the relationship between established user
> organizations and ICANN, you might want to ask if your own group, without any
> organizational documents, without even a mission statement, bylaws or
> charter, even qualifies as an organization suitable for recognition as an
> at-large structure.
>
> As per the Committee on ICANN Evolution and Reform's Second Interim
> Implementation Report:  "We agree that individual at large entities should
> meet some "accreditation" standard, and we find the criteria and standards
> recommended by the Assistance Group to be an attractive list."
>
> This "list" stipulates structured, self-sustaining entities that engage in
> outreach and post current information about the organization's aims,
> structure, constituents, working mechanisms, and current leadership.
>
> 1.  Your aims are not posted
> 2.  You have no organizational structure
> 3.  You are not self-sustaining
> 4.  You have no established working mechanisms or procedures for the general
> membership
> 5.  You can't document any organizational outreach activities
>
> After you get your own house in order, then feel free to question the
> relationship of ISOC chapters to ICANN -- they at least meet the minimum
> criteria expected for an at-large structure.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
> For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de

Regards,
--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup - (Over 127k members/stakeholders strong!)
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com
Contact Number: 214-244-4827 or 972-244-3801
Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de