[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[atlarge-discuss] RE: [atlarge-panel] Re: [atlarge-discuss] WG-OUTREACH 004 - E-mail group and administrivia *with PROPOSAL
I second this! We need to get cranking on outreach.
Bruce Young
Portland, Oregon USA
byoung651@attbi.com
http://www.barelyadequate.info
--------------------------------------------
Support democratic control of the Internet!
Go to http://www.icannatlarge.org and Join ICANN At Large!
| -----Original Message-----
| From: Richard Henderson [mailto:richardhenderson@ntlworld.com]
| Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 1:19 PM
| To: espresso@e-scape.net; atlarge-discuss@lists.fitug.de
| Cc: atlarge-panel@lists.fitug.de
| Subject: [atlarge-panel] Re: [atlarge-discuss] WG-OUTREACH 004 - E-mail
| group and administrivia *with PROPOSAL
|
|
| To get some clarity in order to press on, I'd like to ask a "stupid"
| question to the panel and everyone else.
|
| I think there is a view that the WG-OUTREACH would do well to
| transfer its
| correspondence 'off' our overcrowded discuss and panel lists, to address
| some of the outreach-specific issues and tasks, while obviously
| wanting to
| archive any correspondence on any alternative list for the purposes of
| transparency, and while also retaining a responsibility to report back
| clearly and regularly to the panel and membership as a whole.
|
| This might just be a simple do-today matter of subscribing to a list.
|
| My "stupid" question is this : Have we, as participants, got the
| right and
| sanction of the whole organisation to just go ahead and start a list for
| outreach (in the absence of anyone producing anything else) or
| do we have to
| wait for a general policy decision to be taken on what lists and
| where, for
| ALL the working groups?
|
| OK - that's my question.
|
| Could anyone who thinks we should not/ must not go ahead and just start a
| list, please express your views (which are, of course, welcome).
|
| Otherwise, I guess the answer to my "stupid" question is: people
| are happy
| for us as a WG-OUTREACH to just get on and mobilise and get on
| with things
| on a list (albeit we are mostly agreed that we should act
| intelligently and
| cautiously until we have a more clearly-defined product to
| 'sell'). There is
| so much we *could* be getting on and doing in preparation that I think it
| would be a pity if we drifted on for another 2 months and *then* had to
| start from scratch.
|
| Can we / should we set up an Outreach list now? And if we should have the
| Panel's sanction first:
|
| "I PROPOSE the motion that the Outreach WG can proceed to set up
| a list to
| better carry out its duties."
|
| Maybe this Motion isn't even necessary. Tell me what you think.
|
| Richard
|
| ----- Original Message -----
| From: <espresso@e-scape.net>
| To: <atlarge-discuss@lists.fitug.de>
| Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 7:12 PM
| Subject: [atlarge-discuss] WG-OUTREACH 004 - E-mail group and
| administrivia
|
|
| At 08:22 -0400 2002/10/21, Ron Sherwood wrote:
| >Since some movers and shakers seem to have migrated to
| WG-OUTREACH, it does
| >not seem unreasonable to send the work to where it will receive some
| >attention.
| >
| >What a good idea, Judyth.
|
| Thanks, Ron! I thought perhaps we could get list-traffic down to bearable
| while ensuring that the right ideas were sent to the right groups.
|
| Here (thanks to Richard who came through with Gabriel's address) is the
| official WG-OUTREACH membership list, in alphabetical order by surname.
|
| Joey Borda <starwalker@gay.com>,
| Satyajit Gupta <icheckemail@indiatimes.com>,
| Richard Henderson [Chair] <richardhenderson@ntlworld.com>,
| Erick Iriarte Ahon <faia@amauta.rcp.net.pe>,
| Judyth Mermelstein <espresso@e-scape.net>
| Jefsey Morfin <jefsey@mail.club-internet.fr>,
| YJ Park <yjpark@myepark.com>,
| Gabriel Pineiro <gpineiro@derecho.org.ar>,
| Roberto Roggiero <roberto@roggiero.net>,
| Sotiris Sotiropoulos <sotiris@hermesnetwork.com>,
| Ron Sherwood <sherwood@islands.vi>,
| Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com>,
| Bruce Young <bruce@barelyadequate.info>
|
| In the absence of any other offers, I volunteer my services as "recording
| secretary" so as to make sure this list is updated when necessary and
| there's some admonistrative backup to the discussions.
|
| However, my equipment setup is not lavish so I cannot promise to
| archive the
| WG-O's discussions indefinitely on it. Perhaps somebody with
| more hard disk
| space could take that on, or perhaps the Webmaster and WG-WEB
| could arrange
| to have to messages archived on the existing site if we send them along?
| Just another little idea...
|
| Regards,
|
| Judyth
|
|
|
| ##########################################################
| Judyth Mermelstein "cogito ergo lego ergo cogito..."
| Montreal, QC <espresso@e-scape.net>
| ##########################################################
| "A word to the wise is sufficient. For others, use more."
| ##########################################################
|
|
|
| ---------------------------------------------------------------------
| To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
| For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de
|
|
|
| ---------------------------------------------------------------------
| To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-panel-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
| For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-panel-help@lists.fitug.de
|
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de