Jamie, I think this is just in response to the current level of [neglect? disorganization? not-set-up-edness?]. I gather it's more of an accountability-focused committee (currently) and will gradually narrow its focus to being a place to talk about technical concerns, ideas, and frustrations... but only after a sufficient level of accountability is reached. I agree with the minimalist approach for the most part (just fire them if they do a lousy job), but I think there is some call for procedure/policy on official website content so that we actually know what constitutes a lousy job. -s On Wed, 2002-10-30 at 07:14, James Love wrote: > Ok people. After we have dozens or hundreds of people on the committee to > manage the web site, what next? Isn't this pretty silly? Can anyone point > to even one organization that has a similiar structure to manage an > organization web site? Maybe we need to grow up a bit and think about what > we are trying to manage. Jamie
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part