Re: [atlarge-discuss] Re: [wg-web] Re: [atlarge-discuss] Opening ofthe WG-Web mailing list

[eric@hi-tek.com]

No Stephen,
as weird and petty as it may sound it is power grabbing.
e

Stephen Waters wrote:

> Jamie,
>
> I think this is just in response to the current level of [neglect?
> disorganization? not-set-up-edness?]. I gather it's more of an
> accountability-focused committee (currently) and will gradually narrow
> its focus to being a place to talk about technical concerns, ideas, and
> frustrations... but only after a sufficient level of accountability is
> reached.
>
> I agree with the minimalist approach for the most part (just fire them
> if they do a lousy job), but I think there is some call for
> procedure/policy on official website content so that we actually know
> what constitutes a lousy job.
>
> -s
>
> On Wed, 2002-10-30 at 07:14, James Love wrote:
> > Ok people.  After we have dozens or hundreds of people on the committee to
> > manage the web site, what next?  Isn't this pretty silly?  Can anyone point
> > to even one organization that has a similiar structure to manage an
> > organization web site?   Maybe we need to grow up a bit and think about what
> > we are trying to manage.   Jamie
>
>   ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>                        Name: signature.asc
>    signature.asc       Type: application/pgp-signature
>                 Description: This is a digitally signed message part


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de