Re: [atlarge-discuss] mission statement -- was [Website defaced]

[eric@hi-tek.com]

thank you very much,

I think that those of us arguing for a world view and not an ICANN
View have been proved correct by Shanghai.
There is room for us.
We cannot pledge to usurp our own governments but every thing
else is fair game.
e

Stephen Waters wrote:

> On Sun, 2002-11-03 at 10:47, Abel Wisman wrote:
> >
> > 1. re-draft or re-visit of bylaws of the organization
>
> I seem to recall a few people saying that the Mission Statement and
> Vision should be completed before the Bylaws. This was because they
> define the goals toward which the Bylaws should aim (sort of like the
> Preamble to the US Constitution defines the goals toward which the
> Articles and Amendments aim).
>
> Several Mission and Vision Statements have been posted (including my
> own... shameless plug ;). If you have any experience with this, if you
> could review them that'd be awesome.
>
> If you need the thread fwd'd to you, let me know. Otherwise, check out
> the thread starting here:
>
> http://www.fitug.de/atlarge-discuss/0210/msg00865.html
>
> Thanks,
> -s
>
>   ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>                        Name: signature.asc
>    signature.asc       Type: application/pgp-signature
>                 Description: This is a digitally signed message part

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de