RE: [atlarge-discuss] Re: [atlarge-panel] MOTIONS for a bottom-up web structure as expressed by Wiseman/Khan

["Bruce Young" <bruce@barelyadequate.info>]

I totally agree.  This is the "meat" of why we exist.

I'll look at this closely tomorrow and pass on my thoughts on it.

Bruce Young
Portland, Oregon USA
bruce@barelyadequate.info
http://www.barelyadequate.info
--------------------------------------------
Support democratic control of the Internet!
Go to http://www.icannatlarge.org and Join ICANN At Large!


|  -----Original Message-----
|  From: Richard Henderson [mailto:richardhenderson@ntlworld.com]
|  Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 2:59 PM
|  To: Richard Henderson; abel@able-towers.com; 'Jkhan';
|  atlarge-discuss@lists.fitug.de
|  Cc: atlarge-panel@lists.fitug.de
|  Subject: [atlarge-discuss] Re: [atlarge-panel] MOTIONS for a bottom-up
|  web structure as expressed by Wiseman/Khan
|  
|  
|  I found updated info on the NewTLD Evaluation Process here:
|  http://www.icann.org/committees/ntepptf/new-gtld-action-plan-18oct02.htm
|  (link also posted at IcannWatch)
|  
|  These statements by Stuart Lynn are very interesting and require 
|  our early
|  attention, discussion and an input (which has been requested)
|  
|  Should 3 more (probably sponsored) NewTLDs go ahead, in tandem 
|  with the as
|  yet not commenced New TLDs Evaluation Process?
|  
|  Should a broader look be taken at the taxonomy of the DNS - and 
|  if so, who
|  should be determining policy on the future naming structures of the
|  Internet?
|  
|  It is proposed that decisions will be taken at Amsterdam, so we ought to
|  present our views in advance, and also be ready with statements for
|  Amsterdam itself.
|  
|  Richard H
|  
|  ----- Original Message -----
|  From: Richard Henderson <richardhenderson@ntlworld.com>
|  To: Richard Henderson <richardhenderson@ntlworld.com>;
|  <abel@able-towers.com>; 'Jkhan' <Jkhan@MetroMgr.com>;
|  <atlarge-discuss@lists.fitug.de>
|  Cc: <atlarge-panel@lists.fitug.de>
|  Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 8:15 PM
|  Subject: Re: [atlarge-panel] MOTIONS for a bottom-up web structure as
|  expressed by Wiseman/Khan
|  
|  
|  
|  > On a separate Icann note, I understand that Icann was 
|  scheduled to devote
|  30
|  > minutes of the Shanghai meetings to the New TLDs Evaluation 
|  Process. Did
|  > this actually happen? Where are the details/minutes of this? 
|  What is ICANN
|  > now proposing with regard to this Process? What about the
|  NewTLDsEvaluation
|  > Task Force? Is it still in existence? YJ, I think you were on 
|  it. Can you
|  > give me any up-to-date information on what is proposed next? Who
|  > chaired/chairs this Task Force? Have the Registry Evaluation 
|  reports been
|  > disclosed (as mandated under Appendix U of their Registry 
|  Agreements) - or
|  > are they still being withheld by Icann? How can constituencies make an
|  > informed participation in an important process like this if ICANN
|  withholds
|  > central data (now over 6 months after it could and should have been
|  > released)?
|  >
|  > Any info on these matters from anyone on these lists would be greatly
|  > appreciated.
|  >
|  > Thanks
|  >
|  > Richard H
|  
|  
|  
|  ---------------------------------------------------------------------
|  To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
|  For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de
|  

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de