[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [atlarge-discuss] election or disbanding



On 11:33 17/03/03, Vittorio Bertola said:
I have tried not to interfere with your actions, because I think that
you should independently conduct elections so that a new Panel may be
determined.
You created a King and a Queen, instead of going by your word
(and normal duty to complete the Panel and pass the List and
passwords to the Panelist). You known the result.

I have said many times that I am available to provide some support if
necessary, even if I think it would be better if I did not participate
in setting up these elections, given the controversy.
You said many time that delaying chorus.
To permit the process you only had to go by your
word and duty, to pass the info to Bruce and me.
As we made it clear from day one.

you say:
> Of course I seem to have strongly discontented both you and Jefsey,
> but I would have been much more worried about the correctness of my
> actions if I had discontented just one of the two parties :-)

What a joke!
"you and Jefsey". You keep using that and so does Judyth.
And to prove I am one of the party one tells me "you even said
you are not a candidate", ie I am not a party.

I asked you to send the List the Panelists, to Joop if he was
giving all of us warranties he is not ready to give if he is not
pushed (not to be a candidate, 5 watchdogs, me as one).

We all scream, stop kiddings us, Dear ALAC Chair, and
permits all of us to run that bloody election.

All you did is to have sent our List we all need to a dead-end
perfectly knowing that the day the Panel (or even Joop) would
have we would work on it all together.

All this has a simple name "divide to kill" :-)
jfc





---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de