[atlarge-discuss] election or disbanding

["J-F C. (Jefsey) Morfin" <jefsey@club-internet.fr>]

Dear Internet Governance At Large Members,
the situation of this group is such that I hink we may do three things:

1. accept that Judyth and Jan have been manipulated by Vittorio in closing 
the shop and disband.
2. forget, forgive and start anew, on different premises; but I doubt many 
would be excited after the WG-Review, IDNO and the icannatlarge.org 
experiences.
3. create a survival committee to organize elections and present a position 
statement for RIO.

I am ready to try that third way. To organize elections there are two 
possiblities, either a neutral and legitimate team, or an all parties 
co-management. For whatever reason, the first solution being denied to us, 
the second solution is to be our solution.

I therefore propose that we nominate who we want, or autonominate 
ourselves, and that those who accept to be Panelist Candidates enter an 
Election Committee Pact to elect a Panel. Since we are denied our own list, 
we will use whatever list we have. The committee will decide. It will also 
decide the voting method.

If such a Committee is formed, I will be a candidate to join it. If a 
neutral third party is then requested to coorganize the vote, I will be 
glad abandonning such a candidacy to that end.

jfc


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de