Re: [atlarge-discuss] Re: A Possible ICANN Plan...030317ii

[Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com>]

Danny and all fellow members,

DannyYounger@cs.com wrote:

> Dear Jeff,
>
> Re:  << I have been made aware that some of them have set up several other
> meetings during their attendance in Rio, and their schedule is rather tight
> as I understand it... >>
>
> If you would be good enough to post their schedule, I will endeavor to meet
> with your INEGroup members.

  I wish I could do that.  But that would not be possible at this time.
However as I said in my previous post in response to your request,
I have forwarded that said request to those of our members that
such concerns, or may be interested.

>  As there will be hundreds of individuals
> attending the various ICANN functions, it would also certainly be helpful if
> I knew which nametags to be looking for...

  As I said in my earlier post Danny, those of our members attending
in Rio will self identify or contact you if they are interested or have
the time in their schedule's to meet with you as per your request.
At this late date prior to Rio, which I also mentioned in my previous
post on this thread in response to you, their schedule is rather tight
as I understand it.

>
>
> As to my interest in meeting with your members... if the At-Large is to
> thrive, we in the At-Large should get to know one another, wouldn't you
> agree?

  Currently there really is not "Official" At-Large, yet some efforts such
as ICANNATLARGE.ORG are attempting to become one.  As you also
know the ALAC seems to consider itself the "official ICANN Committee"
to formulating and At-Large structure part of ICANN.  But I agree
that "At-Large" members should get to know each other as best as they
can, abel or are willing to do.   As INEGroup is not yet, and thus far
is not allowed to become part of any ICANN "At-Large" structure,
and no actual "At- Large" structure yet exists as part of ICANN,
INEGroup is therefore of course not a part.  We represent
stakeholders/users/registrants that have been purposefully disenfranchised
largely by the ICANN management or any constituency that is extant
as part of ICANN, yet some of our members are also constituency
members of several ICANN constituencies...

  I hope that this fully answers  you question Danny.  If not, than I
must admit I am at a loss as to help you any further as to your request.

Regards,
--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 129k members/stakeholders strong!)
================================================================
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com
Contact Number: 214-244-4827 or 214-244-3801



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de