[atlarge-discuss] RE: Election Management

[Eric Dierker <eric@hi-tek.com>]

I am not saying I have total agreement with anyone.
But sometimes you just move forward.
Good suggestions have been put forward.  Let us do likewise and go at it.

Eric Dierker

> Jefsey Morfin wrote:
> 
> |  Dear Bruce,
> |  we now have the list, the ftp access and the domainname control. | 
> We being
> |  you, Eric, Jan, Judyth and me. I suggest that we forget about
> |  all the past
> |  and actually try to get those elections rolling.
> 
> I agree!
> 
> |  You took the lead and I
> |  support that. I responded my positions and I think we are in
> argeement. |  Abel proposed to develop whatever is needed and you
> proposed
> |  Joop to pass his questions and to DPF to edit them.
> 
> Yes, we are in agreement.
> 
> |  What next? I must say I am overwhlemed and have not much time left
> for |  this. What I can do without problem is:
> 
> This sounds excellent!  I understand what you're doing, but don't have
> the skills to set it up myself, so I'll defer to you and Abel to get
> the voting system set up and working.
> 
> In the interim here's what I can be doing:
> 
> -  I'll draft a message to the membership asking for nominations and
> questions, and probably include Joop's question list as an example, to
> reduce duplicate questions!  I'll try and get it drafted tomorrow at
> work, and post it on the Panel list for your and Eric's review.
> 
> -  As soon as we have the message where we want it, I'll be more than
> happy to send it out to the membership list and gather the responses.
> 
> -  Every day or so I'll post the current nominations to the Discuss
> list.
> 
> -  If a person is independantly nominated by two members, we can treat
> that name as being seconded.  The rest can be presented to the Discuss
> list.  If any nominees are not seconded, we have to decide whether we
> pass the names to the membership for seconds.
> 
> -  As nominations are seconded, I can notify the person and solicit a
> bio and candidate's statement.  We probably want to post them on the
> Web site. I'll look at this later tonight and see how complicated it
> might be, and if doable I can do that as well.
> 
> BTW, I still havent heard back from either of you as to the timing I
> suggested.  Here it is again:
> 
> I'm thinking two weeks for inputs from the membership after the message
> goes out, 7-10 days for the membership to review candidates statements,
> and 7-10 days to conduct the election.
> 
> Is this timeline acceptable or do you have alternative ideas?
> 
> Bruce Young
> Portland, Oregon USA
> bruce@barelyadequate.info
> http://www.barelyadequate.info
> --------------------------------------------
> Support democratic control of the Internet!
> Go to http://www.icannatlarge.org and Join ICANN At Large!



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de