[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Fwd: [atlarge-discuss] WHAT MOST MEMBERS WANT]



On Sun, 2003-04-13 at 03:10, Sotiris Sotiropoulos wrote:
> 1. you login to the website and create a user name associated with your
> email address.
> 2. you generate your ballot by voting on the site.
> 3. upon submitting your vote, a receipt copy of your choice(s) is then
> emailed back to you (for your own verification purposes) along with an
> ID,
> 4. you must either log back in to the voting account, or remain logged
> in after steps 2 and 3 and then
> 5. you must enter the ID in the appropriate field to fully commit your
> vote (or perhaps even to scrap it, of course there may need to be two or
> more fields for such a purpose).
> 6. all of the above must occur within the specified voting period.
> 
> Hope that was more clear.

Yes. Some observations:

It gives people a chance to check that their votes were probably
interpreted correctly -- at least on the front-end.

If the code becomes available for download, programmers can verify the
back-end. 

It doesn't assist people with email-only Internet access (I just googled
for "Internet cafe email-only" so it appears there are quite a few of
these around even in the English-speaking world). Granted, all of our
current members probably have web access... I think it was Joop who
reminded us all that you had to create an account on icannatlarge.org to
become a member.

It doesn't help with fraudulent additional accounts per person -- but I
think we're all in agreement that that's too difficult to prevent at
this point.

In conclusion, I think for this election it's fine. I would like to see
our organization expanded to include email-only people in the future,
but for now, this seems ok.

-s

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part