At 05:56 p.m. 30/04/2003, bruce@barelyadequate.info wrote:
The victim does not have to prove that they are false. All he needs to do is to challenge the statement and then the maker of the statements has to prove that they are true.| Such as deliberate (but polite) making of false statements? If they are proven false? Certianly that would be an issue. But we'd have to lock down very succinctly what constitutes a violation, and even then the burden of proof would be on us, requiring facts, not anecdotal evidence alone.