Re: [atlarge-discuss] Tainted election? Prove it!!!

[Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com>]

Bruce and all fellow members,

 Brcue, you are just scrambling here and it is obvious  from the
tone of your remarks, the comments from a number of others before
James or Danny spoke up, and the behind the scenes manipulation
of the membership list engineered by yourself, Eric and Jefsey
that this proposed election was doomed from the very beginning
of it's conception.  Jefsey has only made that even worse.  So James
is quite right although belated in his remarks in refusing to participate.


bruce@barelyadequate.info wrote:

> James Khan wrote:
>
> |  It has become self-apparent that this Election has been tampered with.
> |  I can-not, will-not, and steadfast refuse to participate any
> |  further in this Election.
>
> Your call, James.  But as I see it, the only "taint" on this election is the
> bickering, back-biting, second and third-guessing, and members who can't
> follow simple f@#$ing instructions!  I think it is significant that the
> primary person making this claim is NOT A MEMBER OF THIS ORGANIZATIION!!!
>
> If you have any *provable* allegations about how this election is being
> conducted, then bring 'em on!  But don't you *dare* impugn the honor of
> myself and the few brave others who are trying to get something done for
> this orgaization!  Something, I might add, that everyone was crying for!
>
> The nature of this group being what it is, I expected, going into this
> election, to get a certian number of complaints!  But we got very few
> complaints about the process we intended to implement, and even a few kudos
> on our proposed process, whichj was posted numerous times on this forum as
> it was being developed, and was modified numerous times based on member
> inputs.  Why, then, are people complaining about the process now that we're
> doing *exactly* what we said we would?
>
> The message we sent out was specific about how to make and second
> nominations, accept or decline nominations, and how accepting nominees could
> send in candidate statements. We are not responsible for:
>
>         -  Members who use alternative venues to submit nominations instead of
> simply clicking their "reply" button!
>
>         -  Members who nominated non-members
>
>         -  Non-members who nominated members
>
>         -  Nominees who have failed to send in candidate statements (I have yet to
> receive a single one yet to my personal e-mail address as the message
> instructed! )
>
> To say that this election is "tainted" based on any of the above is
> laughable at best, and at worst is potentially an attempt to subvert the
> election.
>
> Bruce Young
> Portland, Oregon USA
> bruce@barelyadequate.info
> http://www.barelyadequate.info
> --------------------------------------------
> Support democratic control of the Internet!
> Go to http://www.icannatlarge.org and Join ICANN At Large!
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
> For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de

Regards,
--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 129k members/stakeholders strong!)
================================================================
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com
Contact Number: 214-244-4827 or 214-244-3801



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de