Re: [atlarge-discuss] ...Some thoughts...

[Jan Siren <sirenj@earthlink.net>]

Joop Teernstra wrote:
> >
> >Whatever site is the official site of the atlarge, and
> >for now that's "icannatlarge.org", will be the site I
> >concentrate on and use whatever tools are there to work
> >with the membership on projects. Simply put, if a forum
> >is on the atlarge site, I'll interact with and on it. I
> >don't like the current split domains and think it's not
> >best for the organization in the long run. This has
> >nothing to do with who owns or maintains either one,
> >I just think there should be only one point for all
> >information.
> 
> Hugh,
> 
> I agree with everything you say, except for that  last point.
> 
> I think we have to avoid the "one point for all information" like the plague.
> We need redundancy and backup if we want to survive.
> 
> You know how the IDNO was shut down.  You were part of that.
> Control of the domain and the mailing list server was all that was needed.
> 
> Don't you see merit in having  at least 5 icannatlarge presences, same
> graphics, mostly mirrors of each other, all working together and all
> allowing for differences, but each geared to accommodate different
> political tastes?
> 
> That is one of the few ways I see natural "internet democracy" as possible.
> 
> icannatlarge.info is still available?
> 

Joop, may I take this as your specific response to the question I posed?  It 
seems complete as it stands - I don't seee a need for you to provide more 
detail at this point, unless you wish to.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de