Re: [atlarge-discuss] POLING COMMITTEE: Status Report

[Eric Dierker <eric@hi-tek.com>]

I am reading every post and think this is going fine.
There should always be critics.
I do not like my new roll as a watcher rather than a critic.
But I have seen many of these posts from very fine people and 
look forward to their election and input.

Jefsey, you have done a job under the worst circumstances and I
will always appreciate your efforts.
(oh I do laugh that your worst critics are Canadian and Texan)
Our borders are dissolving.
Extending time was correct, the people who are nominated are a broad cross 
section of world and life.
Good luck to all candidates.
Eric Dierker

> Dear Polling Committee Members,
> Dear Members;
> I report here on the status of the preparation of the Panel election:
> 
> The current status is the following;
> - 11 Panelists are to be elected
> - 19 Members have accepted to be a candidate
> - 3 Members have not been reached at their listed mail address
> - 34 Nominees have declined
> - 99 Members have not responded yet
> - 3 Members are considering after a first question
> - 1013 Members have a working listed e-mail
> The detail of the responses and of the links is semi-automatically 
> maintained at http://execlub.org/atlarge.htm
> 
> 
> The mail I proposed yesterday and you tacitly agreed has been sent to
> all  the nominees after being edited by a neutral professional third
> party. As  you know it recalls the Candidates about the missing URL and
> the debate on  the mailing list; and the nominees about the need for
> them to respond  before midnight GMT tomorrow.
> 
> 
> The following part interests every one:
> "The ballot will include questions to the Members by the Members. The 
> responses will tell the Panelists what the Members want them to do.
> Please  send your concerns to the Polling Committee. They will be
> packed by themes.  We do not want to overlook any theme and any
> suggested option."
> 
> 
> The following paragraph is of interest to the nominees having declined
> and  to the whole Membership:
> "Many have proposed to help: you can now be a watchdog. You will
> receive a  copy of all the Voters ID. The whole file of the anonymous
> votes will be  released after the vote. This list will permit you to
> check that no faked  ballot was counted and also that no ballot was
> removed. You will 
> participate to the vote on litigious cases. The Polling Committee
> Members  act as watchdogs too. They have received the list of the names
> associated  to each Voter ID.
> 
> For practical management reasons the Polling Committee may chose a
> maximum  of three Watchdogs among the interested Members." (I note that
> I added that  last sentence after considering the load on me and the
> time draught from my  familly and my business).
> 
> 
> The dates of the vote are from May 17th to May 27th. We have voted your
>  proposed a 10 days voting period to give time to the Members. At that
> time  we feared that candidates could be hurt by ad hominem and
> bickering. It  seems the dialog is courteous. Would that permit to give
> it some extra days?
> 
> jfc
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de For
> additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de