[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [atlarge-discuss] POLLING COMMITTEE: mail sent to all the members
James,
Objection. These are not good questions. They promote a fundamental
misunderstanding about whois the At Large. At Large exists to promote the
interests of *users* on the demand side, as opposed to those on the supply
side. Naturally, some of those users will be Individual Domain Name
Registrants, whose interests are the focus of some candidates, Joop for
example, but to imply that domain name issues are the only concerns of this
organization, and to omit reference to the general public user anywhere in
your questions completely misses the fundamental principles at the heart of
the At Large. Put simply, the At Large exists to lobby for the user interest
that ICANN ignores. It exists for the benefit of the public, not domain name
registrants, individual, corporate or otherwise.
Joanna
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jkhan [mailto:Jkhan@MetroMgr.com]
> Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2003 2:58 PM
> To: J-F C. (Jefsey) Morfin
> Cc: atlarge@execlub.org; atlarge-discuss@lists.fitug.de
> Subject: Re: [atlarge-discuss] POLLING COMMITTEE: mail sent to all the
> members
>
>
> Jefsey, Please find my five ballot questions to follow below:
>
> Re:
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "J-F C. (Jefsey) Morfin" <jefsey@club-internet.fr>
> To: <atlarge-discuss@lists.fitug.de>
> Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2003 7:32 AM
> Subject: [atlarge-discuss] POLLING COMMITTEE: mail sent to all the members
>
>
> Snip
>
> > Due to the change of dates, Members and Candidates can still send
> > suggestions for the ballot document to Jefsey Morfin until Thursday 21
> > 00:00 GMT. He will be responsible for splitting the questions in
> consistent
> > themes and for the presentation of the ballot.
>
> Dear Members and Candidates,
>
> Question 1.
> What processes, management, organizational goals, lead you to believe that
> your ideals are better than that of ICANN ?
>
> Question 2.
> Which of the following comprises "WHO" IcannatLarge should represent:
>
> A. Individual Domain Registrants
>
> B. Individual & Bulk Domain Registrants
>
> C. Bulk Domain Registrants
>
> D. Bulk Domain Registrants & Corporate Registrars
>
> E. Individual, Bulk Domain Registrants & Corporate Registrars
>
> Question 3.
> Do you favor a two year Cooling-Off Period* for former panel,
> executive, and
> representative members of :
> ICANN, DNSO, IDNO, NSO, ICANN, ITU, WTO, WIPO, IETF, ISOC, IOD, etc..
> [* A ban from participating and lobbying in current Forums.]
>
> A. Yes
> B. No.
>
>
> Question 4.
> Do you think Icanatlarge.ORG and Icanatlarge.COM should be separated and
> allowed to develop individually under separate houses?
>
> A. Yes
> B. No.
>
> Question 5.
> Which one of the following is most closely related to the reason you
> participate in Icannatlarge:
>
> A. Individual Domain Registrants Rights
>
> B. Bulk Registrants Rights
>
> C. Industrial Lobby (Internet Telecommunications, Registrars and Corps.)
>
> D. Governmental Affiliate (US, DoC, UN, EU, ccTDL-Country)
>
> E. Icann Member (Member of Icann structure)
>
> F. Democracy Study (Foundation, Grant related work)
>
> G. Human Rights Study (Foundation, Grant related work)
>
> --
> End
>
> James Khan
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
> For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de