Re: [atlarge-discuss] POLLING COMMITTEE: mail sent to all the members

["Jkhan" <Jkhan@MetroMgr.com>]

Joanne, Jefsey;

That's Fair enough, I agree with you. Perhaps then the Question should
include: Public Internet Users.
I didn't intent to mislead the Audience, or lead them at all.
I am interested in 'where?' that Audience is coming from regarding their
feeling's of Icannatlarge focus.
Thanks

re-write:
Question 2.
Which of the following comprises "WHO" IcannatLarge should represent:

A. Public Internet Users
B.  Individual Domain Registrants
C. Individual & Bulk Domain Registrants
D. Bulk Domain Registrants & Corporate Registrars
E. Individual, Bulk Domain Registrants & Corporate Registrars



----- Original Message -----
From: "Joanna Lane" <jo-uk@rcn.com>
To: "Jkhan" <Jkhan@MetroMgr.com>; "J-F C. (Jefsey) Morfin"
<jefsey@club-internet.fr>
Cc: <atlarge@execlub.org>; <atlarge-discuss@lists.fitug.de>
Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2003 3:47 PM
Subject: RE: [atlarge-discuss] POLLING COMMITTEE: mail sent to all the
members


> James,
> Objection. These are not good questions. They promote a fundamental
> misunderstanding about whois the At Large. At Large exists to promote the
> interests of *users* on the demand side, as opposed to those on the supply
> side. Naturally, some of those users will be Individual Domain Name
> Registrants, whose interests are the focus of some candidates, Joop for
> example, but to imply that domain name issues are the only concerns of
this
> organization, and to omit reference to the general public user anywhere in
> your questions completely misses the fundamental principles at the heart
of
> the At Large. Put simply, the At Large exists to lobby for the user
interest
> that ICANN ignores. It exists for the benefit of the public, not domain
name
> registrants, individual, corporate or otherwise.
> Joanna

> >
> > Question 2.
> > Which of the following comprises "WHO" IcannatLarge should represent:
> >
> > A.  Individual Domain Registrants
> >
> > B. Individual & Bulk Domain Registrants
> >
> > C. Bulk Domain Registrants
> >
> > D. Bulk Domain Registrants & Corporate Registrars
> >
> > E. Individual, Bulk Domain Registrants & Corporate Registrars
> >
> > Question 3.
> > Do you favor a two year Cooling-Off Period* for former panel,
> > executive, and
> > representative members of :
> > ICANN, DNSO, IDNO, NSO, ICANN, ITU, WTO, WIPO, IETF, ISOC, IOD, etc..
> > [* A ban from participating and lobbying in current Forums.]
> >
> > A. Yes
> > B. No.
> >
> >
> > Question 4.
> > Do you think Icanatlarge.ORG and Icanatlarge.COM should be separated and
> > allowed to develop individually under separate houses?
> >
> > A. Yes
> > B. No.
> >
> > Question 5.
> > Which one of the following is most closely related to the reason you
> > participate in Icannatlarge:
> >
> > A. Individual Domain Registrants Rights
> >
> > B. Bulk Registrants Rights
> >
> > C. Industrial Lobby (Internet Telecommunications, Registrars and Corps.)
> >
> > D. Governmental Affiliate (US, DoC, UN, EU, ccTDL-Country)
> >
> > E. Icann Member (Member of  Icann structure)
> >
> > F. Democracy Study (Foundation, Grant related work)
> >
> > G. Human Rights Study (Foundation, Grant related work)
> >
> > --
> > End
> >
> > James Khan
> >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
> > For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de
> >
>
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de