[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [atlarge-discuss] Is This The Party To Whom I Am Speaking...
Joop Teernstra wrote:
At 01:35 a.m. 24/05/2003, Walter Schmidt wrote:
We seem so bent on being able to say we elected 11, why?
And why, when a call for nomination is made, we find folks with whom our
previous contact has been non-existant, "filling out" the list...
That is a question for Jefsey and his cronies!!!!
This election has been compromised by the very people running it.
It's a sham.
As we continue to be in a start-up-phase, perhaps we should consider a
smaller group of individuals with whom we have previously "worked."
After all...
"Better the devil you know than the devil you don't know."
- English Proverb
Absolutely!
That is why I think we have to protect ourselves and elect only the
top five vote getters.
The membership polled against having an 11 member panel this time,
let's not forget that.
-joop-
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de
--
-----------
"The science of jurisprudence regards the state and power as the
ancients regarded fire- namely, as something existing absolutely.
But for history, the state and power are merely phenomena, just as for
modern physics fire is not an element but a phenomenon.
From this fundamental difference between the view held by history
and that held by jurisprudence, it follows that jurisprudence can tell
minutely how in its opinion power should be constituted and what
power- existing immutably outside time- is, but to history's questions
about the meaning of the mutations of power in time it can answer
nothing."
--Leo Tolstoy, "War and Peace"
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de