I assume that those members scoring a 5 (highest possible score to the
committee's reckoning) are verified already ?
Actually, I think it's necessary to verify every one of the current
Panelists. As elected representatives, I don't see why any of them
would have a problem with that. It's part of holding a position of
responsibility. One has to engender the highest level of trust. As you
can see, there is a big question mark over the identities of a number of
the Panelists, so rather than single them out, I think it's best we all
be verified this time round as a sign of good faith and square dealing.