[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [atlarge-discuss] Membership Committee
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Sotiris Sotiropoulos
>>
>> I heartily disagree. I think it's the job of the Panelists to be
>> directly involved in the formation and Chairing of any and all
>> Committees which are formed.
>
> The membership said:
>
> 5. such a Panel should:
> [Choose one only]
> 50(Y) - 15(N) administer specialized committees
> 41(Y) - 13(N) liaise with responsible committees
> 25(Y) - 19(N) be a "do-it-all" Panel
Thanks Hugh for pointing out the fact that the will of the membership leans
towards having the Panelists administer any specialized committees.
>
> 7. if we have committees should they:
> [Answer all that apply]
> 62(Y) - 9(N) be elected by the Members
> 61(Y) - 3(N) organize an open deddicated maillist
> 51(Y) - 7(N) completed by open working groups
> 45(Y) - 16(N) be chosen by the Panel
> 24(Y) - 19(N) be self selected
Considering the urgent need for verification of the candidates at this
juncture, and without a clearly defined process for any of this
organization's mechanisms (esp. a Membership and Polling Committee), I
think it's only sensible that we proceed as we can through volunteers from
among the members with a Panelist Chair for the membership Committee. In
future, I agree that committees ought to be elected, yet chaired by a panel
member.
--Sotiris Sotiropoulos
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de