RE: [atlarge-discuss] correction MEMEBRS AS WATCHDOGS

[Joanna Lane <jo-uk@rcn.com>]

Correction - 16 out of 18 are wrong - representing 90% misreported by The
Polling Committee - still impressively inadequate.
Joanna

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Joanna Lane [mailto:jo-uk@rcn.com]
> Sent: Sunday, June 01, 2003 8:33 PM
> To: abel@able-towers.com; 'Atlarge Discuss List'
> Subject: RE: [atlarge-discuss] MEMEBRS AS WATCHDOGS - RECOUNT
>
>
> Abel,
> I sure hope you're wrong because that's a staggering 99% error
> rate by the Polling Committee, who will have misreported 17 out
> of a possible 18 results. No doubt you will now appreciate why
> some of us were questioning their methodology.
> Joanna
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Abel Wisman [mailto:abel@able-towers.com]
> > Sent: Sunday, June 01, 2003 7:26 PM
> > To: 'Atlarge Discuss List'
> > Subject: RE: [atlarge-discuss] MEMEBRS AS WATCHDOGS - RECOUNT
> >
> >
> > After reading this I did my own "count" by simply going through the file
> > manually (ok I used "find")  to do a visual count of the votes this lead
> > to conclude that there are some discrepencies.
> > These discrepencies are easily explained reading the the code in
> > "watch.c" and as Jefsey explained in his email.
> >
> > On this "visual" count, which is not as easy as counting to 10 I come to
> > the following count (in brackets the original count):
> >
> > 1. Joop Teenstra		97 (100)
> > 2. David Goldstein	70 ( 71)
> > 3. Sebastian Klein	68 ( 68)
> > 4. Daniel Chirita		65 ( 67)
> > 5. Daniel Tobias		60 ( 63)
> > 5. Abel Wisman		60 ( 61)
> > 7. Ivonne Muņoz Torres	59 ( 59)
> > 7. Andre Rebentisch	59 ( 61)
> > 9. Hugh Blair		58 ( 59)
> > 10 Gilbert Lumantao	57 ( 59)
> > 11 Mauro Demian Rios	47 ( 48)
> > 11 Sotiris Sotiropoulos	47 ( 51)
> >
> >
> > 13 Jonathan Robin		45 ( 47)
> > 14 Dominic Pinto		44 ( 46)
> > 14 Catherine Hughes	44 ( 46)
> > 14 James Graham		44 ( 46)
> > 17 Thierry Amoussougbo	43 ( 44)
> > 18 Curtis M Kularski	41 ( 44)
> >
> > Please do your own visual or coded count, I can easily have made errors,
> > though I believe I was somehow thorough.
> >
> > Kind regards
> >
> >
> > Abel
> >
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Jefsey Morfin [mailto:jefsey@online.fr]
> > > Sent: 01 June 2003 19:59
> > > To: Atlarge Discuss List
> > > Subject: [atlarge-discuss] MEMEBRS AS WATCHDOGS - RECOUNT
> > > - there is a recount needed for Mauro and Sotiris. My
> > >    visual recount confirms that Sotiris is elected. But
> > >    a watchdog's perl program says no.
> > >
> > > Walter claimed there was no transparency in Watchdogs.
> > > blahblah. There is transparency as you never known it before.
> > > And I think we still can improve this - even on a large
> > > scale. But this means that all of you are or can be involved
> > > and are co-responsible watchdogs; This is what you wanted,
> > > folks. Now you have it let see what you do with it. No
> > > possible supposed tricks.
> > >
> > > If it works we can have it now made professionnal. Both
> > > in using "mail and vote" and "click and vote".
> > > jfc
> > >
> > > PS. I started as committed http://apolite.net
> > >         Help wanted for the Franglish.
> > >         mailing list for those wanting to act
> > >         "let-have@apolite.net"
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
> > For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de
> >


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de