Re: [atlarge-discuss] Michael Sherrill Phone Call to:Re: [atlarge-discuss] Me...

[Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com>]

Michael and all fellow members,

  Yes it can be verified. My phone number that I called you from
is listed!  So again you are making another knowingly false statement
Michael.  Either that or you are demonstrating
your gross lack of knowledge base in communications
technology. It is also registered to me in my name.



Micheal Sherrill wrote:

> Hello Danny:
>
> Thank you for bringing this to my attention.  I installed a filter many months
> ago to separate Jeff Williams from the reality of this organization.  It reduced
> the amount of email considerably.  More so, it had no effect on the ability to
> perceive the progress of the group.  Late tonight (11:15 PM) I received a phone
> call purportedly from someone named Jeff Williams.  This cannot, unfortunately,
> be verified.  There is a Jeff Williams that posts to this site but that entity
> has not been authenticated.  Jeff Williams has a very long history of non-
> authenticated boastings, ramblings, and threats.  So, when I received his
> belligerent phone call I told him he was a kook, a zombie, and a butt head.  And
> then I hung up.
>
> I do not respond to non-entities, email or phone call.  There may be a real
> person typing on a keyboard or making phone calls but that real person is not
> Jeff Williams.
>
> Let us continue to work towards making this a responsible organization.  One
> person one vote.
>
> Regards,
>
> Micheal Sherrill
>
>
> ---------- Original Message ----------------------------------
> From: DannyYounger@cs.com
> Date:  Thu, 5 Jun 2003 02:56:31 EDT
>
> Re:  "But I got you on tape fella!"
>
> Jeff, please be advised that U.S. Federal statutes provide criminal penalties
> for unlawful interception of telephone conversations, including up to five
> years' imprisonment or a maximum of $10,000 in fines.
>
> Calls that cross state lines are admittedly complicated legal issues
> especially when one state is a one party consent state (such as Texas) and the other
> state is an all party consent state (such as California),  but since the call
> went across a state line, the federal laws would certainly apply.  Surely you
> recall the indictment of Linda Tripp on such charges -- she recorded the
> telephone conversations of Monica Lewinski concerning her relationship with
> President Clinton (and did not have the consent of the party being recorded).
>
> Personally, I think your practice of recording other peoples telephone calls
> to you without their knowledge and consent is repugnant.
>
> *************************************************
>  Listen to the "World's Classical Radio Station"
>            http://www.beethoven.com
> Great Music, Free Email, Exciting Bulletin Board!
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
> For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de

Regards,

--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 131k members/stakeholders strong!)
"Be precise in the use of words and expect precision from others" -
    Pierre Abelard
================================================================
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com
Contact Number: 214-244-4827 or 214-244-3801



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de