Re: [atlarge-discuss] Michael Sherrill Phone Call to:Re: [atlarge-discuss] Me...

["Ron Sherwood" <sherwood@islands.vi>]

Atlarge members beware.  This is what can happen to you if you publish your
phone number.  At least, you can filter email.

Ron Sherwood

----- Original Message -----
From: "Micheal Sherrill" <micheal@beethoven.com>
To: <atlarge-discuss@lists.fitug.de>
Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2003 3:13 AM
Subject: Re: [atlarge-discuss] Michael Sherrill Phone Call to:Re:
[atlarge-discuss] Me...


> Hello Danny:
>
> Thank you for bringing this to my attention.  I installed a filter many
months
> ago to separate Jeff Williams from the reality of this organization.  It
reduced
> the amount of email considerably.  More so, it had no effect on the
ability to
> perceive the progress of the group.  Late tonight (11:15 PM) I received a
phone
> call purportedly from someone named Jeff Williams.  This cannot,
unfortunately,
> be verified.  There is a Jeff Williams that posts to this site but that
entity
> has not been authenticated.  Jeff Williams has a very long history of non-
> authenticated boastings, ramblings, and threats.  So, when I received his
> belligerent phone call I told him he was a kook, a zombie, and a butt
head.  And
> then I hung up.
>
> I do not respond to non-entities, email or phone call.  There may be a
real
> person typing on a keyboard or making phone calls but that real person is
not
> Jeff Williams.
>
> Let us continue to work towards making this a responsible organization.
One
> person one vote.
>
> Regards,
>
>
> Micheal Sherrill
>
>
>
> ---------- Original Message ----------------------------------
> From: DannyYounger@cs.com
> Date:  Thu, 5 Jun 2003 02:56:31 EDT
>
> Re:  "But I got you on tape fella!"
>
> Jeff, please be advised that U.S. Federal statutes provide criminal
penalties
> for unlawful interception of telephone conversations, including up to five
> years' imprisonment or a maximum of $10,000 in fines.
>
> Calls that cross state lines are admittedly complicated legal issues
> especially when one state is a one party consent state (such as Texas) and
the other
> state is an all party consent state (such as California),  but since the
call
> went across a state line, the federal laws would certainly apply.  Surely
you
> recall the indictment of Linda Tripp on such charges -- she recorded the
> telephone conversations of Monica Lewinski concerning her relationship
with
> President Clinton (and did not have the consent of the party being
recorded).
>
> Personally, I think your practice of recording other peoples telephone
calls
> to you without their knowledge and consent is repugnant.
>
>
> *************************************************
>  Listen to the "World's Classical Radio Station"
>             http://www.beethoven.com
> Great Music, Free Email, Exciting Bulletin Board!
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
> For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de