RE: [atlarge-discuss] Provisional Membership Committee

["Jeff Holt" <jefftttt@txucom.net>]

@Large,

This is simply not true.  And the "Provisional Membership Committee" as
being touted by Sotiris has no means of private communication unless we
expand upon the Group already set up by Joe Borda for that purpose.
Also, the function of the V&C Committee is to perform the procedures and
report essentially a Yes/No verdict on whether the individual meats the
criteria so far in place.  The members of such committee work separately
and cooperatively, communicating within the V&C privately, and the data
provided is NOT meant to be made fully public in order to protect the
Privacy of those verified.  I have also not received any information as
to who the Chair of this Committee actually is, but have seen at least a
simple majority of the PV&C members so far in favor of Joe Borda
continuing in the capacity.

Micheal's assertion that all PV&C verifications need to be public is
misleading.  The VERIFICATIONS ARE public, the data upon which those
Verifications are based do NOT become Public.  For any of the PV&C
members to broadcast any data provided by an @Large member will
eventually be documented and be made reason for immediate removal from
the PV&C Committee as a breach of confidentiality.

Sincerely,
 
Jeff Holt
Jefftttt@txucom.net
www.tejas-info-services.com
 
 

-----Original Message-----
From: Micheal Sherrill [mailto:micheal@beethoven.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 1:06 PM
To: atlarge-discuss@lists.fitug.de
Subject: Re: [atlarge-discuss] Provisional Membership Committee

Hello Ron:

I did not receive any information prior to the report by Sotiris.  In
any case, the Verification Committee needs to make all transactions
public.  Sotiris is only doing his job.

Besides, you are missing the point.  Verification information has to be
made public or it is not transparent.  Now, I am NOT talking about the
private information that could be used for draining a personal bank
account.  But, Joey did publish a rather large amount of personal
information to this site earlier.

I also disagree with your last sentence.  Without a Verification
Committee nothing would get done.  And all verifications need to be
public.

Regards,



Micheal Sherrill


---------- Original Message ----------------------------------
From: "Ron Sherwood" <sherwood@islands.vi>
Date:  Tue, 3 Jun 2003 14:10:04 -0400

Hello, Michael:

The only correspondence that I have received from Sotiris is what I read
on
the public list.  I do not think that private information should be
listed
publicly. As a committee member, I formally object to that action and
ask
that it not happen again.

If you received this information prior to it being published, and agreed
to
go public with it, then you are as accountable as Sotiris. I received
nothing other than what was published to the list.

It is the job of a verification committee to confirm (or not) the
identity
of an individual and to report their findings to the Panel and the
membership. If the whole process is to take place in public... we don't
need
a verification committee.

Best regards, Ron


*************************************************
 Listen to the "World's Classical Radio Station"
            http://www.beethoven.com
Great Music, Free Email, Exciting Bulletin Board!

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de