[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[atlarge-discuss] [Fwd: Re: [Panel] RE: [Panel] MOTION #2003-0 - Chair Rotation and Responsibilities]





-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [Panel] RE: [Panel] MOTION #2003-0 - Chair Rotation and Responsibilities
Date: Sun, 08 Jun 2003 22:30:22 -0400
From: Sotiris Sotiropoulos <sotiris@hermesnetwork.com>
To: panel@mailman.icannatlarge.org
References: <044001c32df7$31bc9380$38281f3e@mephisto>



Abel Wisman wrote:

And again, no answer, no facts, nothing.

Please state facts to backup your concern and please do not compare
pears and apples.
Where is the conflict of interest? Abel Wisman asks.
First off, Abel, let me point out the plain *fact* that at this point you hold more control over this organization than any other member.

If the official website as you and yours allege is icannatlarge.org, then we cannot overlook the *fact* that you have ultimate (albeit indirect), definite, and sole proxy power over icannatlarge.org's dns hosting which means we are effectively at your mercy as to where the site can be hosted at this time. This, due to an as yet unexplained arrangement, and a totally unnecessary and circuitos, nay mysterious, server farm setup.

Furthermore, there is the *fact* that you are a panelist of this organization. I do not think it is appropriate for an executive member of this organization to conveniently find him/herself in such a singular position of unrivalled control over key elements of this organization, as control over the hosting (whether that be dns, mail, dbase, ftp, whatever...) would ultimately entail. [In other words, the same argument(s) that you use against Joop apply just as much to you.] This is not personal, I am just being pragmatic in the interest of the whole organization and its possible future.
Not to mention that I certainly do not think it is appropriate that you should be the one to request/offer it... No offense, but it sounds somewhat Pisistratean to me. I think it's certainly a generous offer you make, but I think it is better for this organization to stay free of such obligations. thank you nonetheless.

Whatever setup Vittorio was responsible for is not transferrable. The membership desired change, NOT a continuance of the same state of affairs. You have altogether too much undelegated control over this organization. In this panel, we are unequal as to our abilities to affect the organization's potential future due to your incommensurately large portion of influence over its "assets", if you like. In old Athens, someone like you would have been ostracize at this point.

Abel

P.S. As for "keen" interest, I made an offer, no "keen" interest, if you
want to make the same offer, with the same accessibility I will support
that. "in it" for me is the loss of a server I can rent out for £ 100 a
month and the bandwidth, I do not even ask for a sponsor mentioning.


Nobody does something for nothing. It doesn't have to be money... it could be anything. Thanks again for your generosity, but it's best that this organization is not beholden to you, Abel Wisman, or any ONE else.

--Sotiris Sotiropoulos





--
-----------

"The science of jurisprudence regards the state and power as the
ancients regarded fire- namely, as something existing absolutely.
But for history, the state and power are merely phenomena, just as for
modern physics fire is not an element but a phenomenon.

From this fundamental difference between the view held by history
and that held by jurisprudence, it follows that jurisprudence can tell
minutely how in its opinion power should be constituted and what
power- existing immutably outside time- is, but to history's questions
about the meaning of the mutations of power in time it can answer
nothing."
				     --Leo Tolstoy, "War and Peace"




---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de