RE: [atlarge-discuss] list confrontation(s)

["Jeff Holt" <jefftttt@txucom.net>]

@Large, 

This thread wanders.  Read Joanna Lane's comments on Rules....
I totally agree with her statements and wonder why you fellows insist on
trying to reinvent another wheel.

Sincerely,
 
Jeff Holt
Jefftttt@txucom.net
www.tejas-info-services.com
 
 
-----Original Message-----
From: Joop Teernstra [mailto:terastra@terabytz.co.nz] 
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 1:45 AM
To: DPF
Cc: Sotiris Sotiropoulos; atlarge-discuss@lists.fitug.de
Subject: Re: [atlarge-discuss] list confrontation(s)

At 05:30 p.m. 9/06/2003, DPF wrote:


>Who judges whether or not a statement has been adequately proven?

A Judge, if it comes to that. :)
Normally the elected moderator , or if it is a very important issue for
the 
list, the list subscribers.

It is all very well to find fault or flaws in the rules and I am happy
with 
alternatives, but in the end the question is do we want list members to 
falsely accuse each other as they please or do we want a list where 
provocative behaviour is sanctioned.

What do you propose instead?

-joop-


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de