Who judges whether or not a statement has been adequately proven?
A Judge, if it comes to that. :)
Normally the elected moderator , or if it is a very important issue for the
list, the list subscribers.
It is all very well to find fault or flaws in the rules and I am happy with
alternatives, but in the end the question is do we want list members to
falsely accuse each other as they please or do we want a list where
provocative behaviour is sanctioned.
What do you propose instead?
-joop-
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de